Re: editor and word processor history (was: Re: RTF for emacs)

In article <87k394mbwd.fsf@debian.uxu>,
 Emanuel Berg <embe8573@student.uu.se> wrote:

> Robert Thorpe <rt@robertthorpeconsulting.com> writes:
> 
> > In those days programs were punched onto cards using
> > keypunches or punched onto paper tape.  Sometimes
> > they were written on paper and someone else would
> > punch them in.  In those early days editors were
> > there to help people fix mistakes afterwards once a
> > file existed on a tape or disk.  Only later were they
> > used for the whole writing process.
> 
> OK, but then how did the data get on the tape/disk in
> the first place?

IIRC, Teletypes could be put into local mode, where what you typed was 
punched directly onto the paper tape.

For punch cards, there were key punches -- they were essentially 
typewriters that punched onto cards instead of writing onto paper.

The ASCII code for DEL is 127 because that was all the bits on a 
7-column paper tape. So if you made a mistake while punching the tape, 
you could back up and press DEL, and it would punch all the holes in 
that row -- it was the paper-tape equivalent of White-Out. Applications 
that read text from paper tape would ignore that code.

-- 
Barry Margolin, barmar@alum.mit.edu
Arlington, MA
*** PLEASE post questions in newsgroups, not directly to me ***

• Re: editor and word processor history (was: Re: RTF for emacs), Emanuel Berg, 2014/05/29
  • Re: editor and word processor history (was: Re: RTF for emacs), Barry Margolin <=
  • Re: editor and word processor history (was: Re: RTF for emacs), Robert Thorpe, 2014/05/29
  • Re: editor and word processor history (was: Re: RTF for emacs), Emanuel Berg, 2014/05/29
    • Re: editor and word processor history, Pascal J. Bourguignon, 2014/05/30
      • Re: editor and word processor history, Emanuel Berg, 2014/05/31

• Prev by Date: Re: editor and word processor history (was: Re: RTF for emacs)
• Next by Date: Re: editor and word processor history
• Previous by thread: Re: editor and word processor history (was: Re: RTF for emacs)
• Next by thread: Re: editor and word processor history (was: Re: RTF for emacs)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread